Research Paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Research Paper - Essay Example This war gained heavy criticism and the critics have established that US was wrong in conducting this war. War on Iraq was not justified due to several reasons including: it had no weapons of mass destruction, it was a weak nation, Iraq did not participate in the attack on the World Trade center, led to increase in terrorists, war was ethically wrong, led to loss of allies, higher cost lower benefits, war was fought for self interest over the interest of the community and led to the destruction of the global economy. Body The main official reason due to which US attacked Iraq was that Iraq and Saddam was in control of weapons of mass destructions and these weapons even were expected to include nukes. US might have made a just decision of going to war on this particular reason but later it was figured out that intelligence regarding weapons of mass destruction was misleading and no weapons of mass destruction were identified in the nation (O’Neill, 2012). The basis on which thi s war took place was that Iraq has previous used weapons that were dangerous in nature during the period of 1980s, but all those weapons were either utilized or recognized as unusable during the 1990s (Zinn, 2002). This clearly represents that US attacked Iraq on the basis of obsolete intelligence and the decision of going to war made by the administration of Bush was not justified. The intelligence gathered during the 1990s clearly showed that Iraq was not in possession of weapons of mass destruction and was not a plausible threat either to US or its allied nations. Even Saddam Hussein never had threatened US and neither to its allied force of attacking them. Neither Saddam nor Iraq poised a threat to the neighboring countries and neither the neighboring countries feared Iraq. Iraq had never attacked any of its neighbors since the end of the Gulf War as it had become quite weak and could not afford any war (O’Neill, 2012). US suspected that Iraq and Saddam had close ties wit h the terrorist group Taliban and its leader Osama Bin Laden and the US even suspected that he might have contributed to the attacks of 9/11 (Zinn, 2002). Since 9/11 US has been at a war against terrorism and has been at war with Afghanistan and Al-Qaeda and its leader Osama Bin Laden, Al-Qaeda had openly accepted the responsibility of the 9/11 attacks and even threatened US to attack US and allied nations in future due to which US launched an attack at Afghanistan and stood victorious. But Saddam Hussein had never conducted such threatening activities and should not have been attacked on the basis of terrorism. Instead of wasting resources in Iraq and causing damage throughout the world US should have focused on its war against terrorism in Afghanistan where the real terrorists exist and who continue to not only disturb the US society, but societies all over the world. Attack on Iraq did not lead to decrease in attack conducted by terrorist groups; rather terrorist groups have beco me much stronger due to this war. Individuals living in Iraq and other countries have started raising their voices against US and there are even those who do not appreciate what US did to Iraq, due to this the terrorist groups have gained more men and more personnel to dismantle US as these terrorist groups use the hatred against US to cause destruction in US. Instead of US distributing its resources

Choose the topic Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Choose the topic - Essay Example The argument that human influence on climate change has numerous negative connotations is based on facts and issues. Case in point is that human beings have politicized the climate change to the extent that scientific reasoning has been compromised. While global warming remains a critical challenge to the local communities and the international system, individuals have politicized the issue for political milestones. Parliamentary committees, governments and houses of representatives have failed to come up with essential solutions that can first track cabbing of global warming. Human beings through political representation have stalled the process of coming up with solutions based on political considerations. Human beings influence on climate change has a number of cons in the sense that a critical thought has not been given to alternative sources of information. Case in point is that while suggestions have been presented on alternative energy use, human beings have remained resistant to change. The old habits persist in the face of global warming because no serious considerations have been given to the sources of energy that induce global warming. If the human beings embraced alternative sources of energy, it would be relatively easy to deal with the challenges of climate change. The political elites are the major beneficiaries in the debate concerning climate change. Case in point is that they develop policies and guidelines that are not geared towards solving the problem, but to massage the issues, and challenges presented. While the political class comes up with information and guidelines that are supposed to guide the debate on climate change, they are careful never to antagonize the system by proposing stringent measures that may not be agreeable to their constituencies. To this extent, it is important to note that political expediency is a driving agenda when climate change is discussed by the elites. Though the politicians benefit through